Ward v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ward v. State

206 So. 2d 922, 281 Ala. 650

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 29, 1967

Docket6 Div. 460

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 206 So. 2d 922 (Ward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. State, 206 So. 2d 922, 281 Ala. 650 (Ala. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

GOODWYN, Justice.

Petition by Gene Ward for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the opinion and decision of that court in Ward v. State of Alabama, 206 So.2d 897 (6 Div. 99.)

The writ is due to be denied. However, we deem it appropriate to state again that “denying the petition for certiorari without opinion by this court is not to be deemed an approval of all statements of law by the Court of Appeals.” See: Mobile Pure Milk Co. v. Coleman, 230 Ala. 432, 434, 161 So. 829.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOODWYN, Justice.

Petition by Gene Ward for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the opinion and decision of that court in Ward v. State of Alabama, 206 So.2d 897 (6 Div. 99.)

The writ is due to be denied. However, we deem it appropriate to state again that “denying the petition for certiorari without opinion by this court is not to be deemed an approval of all statements of law by the Court of Appeals.” See: Mobile Pure Milk Co. v. Coleman, 230 Ala. 432, 434, 161 So. 829.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and COLEMAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 So. 2d 922, 281 Ala. 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-state-ala-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack