Ward v. Stansberry

Fourth Circuit

Ward v. Stansberry

301 F. App'x 300

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2008·No. No. 08-7992·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lancelot Ward, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. Stansberry, No. l:08-cv-00294-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. filed July 8, 2008; entered July 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lancelot Ward, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. Stansberry, No. l:08-cv-00294-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. filed July 8, 2008; entered July 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ward v. Stansberry, 301 F. App'x 300 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

301 F. App'x 300 (Ward v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related