Ward v. Stansberry

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 2, 2008
Docket08-7992
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ward v. Stansberry (Ward v. Stansberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ward v. Stansberry, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7992

LANCELOT WARD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00294-JCC-TCB)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: December 2, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lancelot Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lancelot Ward, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), for lack of jurisdiction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ward v.

Stansberry, No. 1:08-cv-00294-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. filed July 8,

2008; entered July 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ward v. Stansberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-stansberry-ca4-2008.