Ward v. Reliance Engineering Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ward v. Reliance Engineering Co.

114 S.E. 714, 29 Ga. App. 176, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 137

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 14, 1922

Docket13749

StatusPublished

This text of 114 S.E. 714 (Ward v. Reliance Engineering Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. Reliance Engineering Co., 114 S.E. 714, 29 Ga. App. 176, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 137 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The first special ground of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of certain oral testimony, raises no question for the consideration of this court, as it does not appear that any objection was made to the admission of the evidence when it was offered, or that a motion to rule it out was subsequently made.

2. The remaining special ground is that the court committed error “ in refusing to allow ” a certain named witness for the plaintiff to give certain specified testimony. It does not appear from this ground, how[177]*177ever, that a pertinent question was propounded to the witness and that the court ruled out the answer. The ground therefore is too defective to be considered by this court. Griffin v. Henderson, 117 Ga. 382 (2) (43 S. E. 712).

Decided November 14, 1922. A. B. Thornton, for plaintiff. J. C. Hale, contra.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence and the court did not err in refusing the grant of a new trial.

Judgment affirmed,.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI