Ward v. Pollock & Gibbs
2 Posey 311
Opinion
Opinion.— Held, appellant had a lien for the rent in arrears and for current quarter which was in process of becoming due, but not for future periods which had'not commenced. At farthest appellant’s lien would not authorize the issuance of a writ for more than §147, and was below the jurisdiction of the district court. Green v. Bear Bros. & Hirsch, 68 Tex., 628; B. & B. Association v. Cochran, 60 Tex., 620.
There is no error in the judgment, and it is affirmed.
Aeetbmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. Pollock & Gibbs, 2 Posey 311 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1885).
2 Posey 311 (Ward v. Pollock & Gibbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
H. R. E., B. & B. Ass'n v. Cochran
60 Tex. 620 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)
T. L. Marsalis & Co. v. Pitman
5 S.W. 404 (Texas Supreme Court, 1887)