Ward v. Peck
114 Mass. 121
Opinion
This bill cannot be maintained for discovery, because it waives an answer under oath; nor for relief, because the plaintiff has a plain, adequate and complete remedy at law by an action for money had and received. Gen. Sts. c. 113, §§ 2, 4. 8th Rule in Chancery, 104 Mass. 570.
Demurrer sustained, and bill dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. Peck, 114 Mass. 121 (Mass. 1873).
114 Mass. 121 (Ward v. Peck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ball v. Harrison
50 N.E.2d 31 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1943)
Brown v. Corey
77 N.E. 838 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Tillinghast v. Chace
121 F. 435 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island, 1903)
Church v. Anti-Kalsomine Co.
76 N.W. 383 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)
Manley v. Mickle
55 N.J. Eq. 563 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1897)
Dow v. Berry
18 F. 121 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin, 1883)
Frue v. Loring
120 Mass. 507 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1876)