Ward v. Owens

12 Ill. 283
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1850·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Treat, C. J.

This was a bill in chancery to set aside a conveyance. The answer denied the allegations of the bill, and the cause was at issue by the filing of a replication. A decree was entered for the complainant, which the defendant assigns for error. The record fails to show, that any evidence was given to sustain the averments in the bill. The statute authorizing testimony to be introduced orally at the hearing, was only designed to change the mode of taking proof in chancery cases, and does not dispense with the necessity of incorporating it into the record. The evidence, or the facts proved by it, ought to be stated in the record. This Court will not presume that any other proof was made than what appears in the record. Such was the express decision in the ease of White v. Morrison, 11 Illinois, 361. There is then no basis on which this decree can stand. It will be reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Decree reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. Owens, 12 Ill. 283 (Ill. 1850).

12 Ill. 283 (Ward v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crawford-Adsit Co. v. Bell
95 Ill. App. 427 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
Adamski v. Wieczorek
93 Ill. App. 357 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
Ryan v. Sanford
24 N.E. 428 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1890)
Drennan v. Huskey
31 Ill. App. 208 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1889)
Becker v. Becker
15 Ill. App. 247 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1884)
Bonnell v. Lewis
3 Ill. App. 283 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1878)
Reddick v. President of State Bank
27 Ill. 145 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1862)
Cost v. Rose
17 Ill. 276 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1855)
Osborne v. Horine
17 Ill. 92 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1855)
Nichols v. Thornton
16 Ill. 113 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1854)