Ward v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.

49 N.E.2d 159, 290 N.Y. 325, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1119
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 15, 1943·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the Appellate Division that there is no testimony in this record to support a jury finding that defendant failed to comply with a definite notice or warning that the wires had to be removed before a fixed date. However, it was still a question of fact for the jury as to whether under all the circumstances defendant had reason to anticipate that the crane might come into contact with the wires and as to whether defendant’s failure thereafter to remove the wires was negligent.

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur; Lehman, Ch. J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp., 49 N.E.2d 159, 290 N.Y. 325, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1119 (N.Y. 1943).

49 N.E.2d 159 (Ward v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zasada v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
50 A.D.2d 1011 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Pike v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
277 A.D.2d 1120 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Bennett v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co.
62 N.E.2d 219 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)
Bennett v. New York & Queens Electric Light & Power Co.
268 A.D. 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)