Ward v. Metropolitan Distributors, Inc.
Opinion
The appellant’s truck was leased to the respondent for use in the latter’s business, and during such use the plaintiff was injured. Payment was made for plaintiff’s injuries, and the court decided the issues raised in the cross complaints asserted by the two defendant corporations against each other. The lease agreement between appellant and respondent provided that appellant would assume the liability of respondent for injuries resulting from the operation of the leased vehicle while being used or operated in the respondent’s usual course of business. Judgment in favor of respondent unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Lewis, JJ. [See post, p. 1060.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
268 A.D. 994 (Ward v. Metropolitan Distributors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.