Ward v. Horace Mann Insurance

Fourth Circuit

Ward v. Horace Mann Insurance

326 F. App'x 699

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 22, 2009·No. No. 09-1096·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s summary judgment motion on their action for breach of contract under their homeowners’ insurance policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. Horace Mann Ins. Co., No. 4:07-cv-00076-F, 2008 WL [700]*7004933961 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s summary judgment motion on their action for breach of contract under their homeowners’ insurance policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. Horace Mann Ins. Co., No. 4:07-cv-00076-F, 2008 WL [700]*7004933961 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Ward v. Horace Mann Insurance, 326 F. App'x 699 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

326 F. App'x 699 (Ward v. Horace Mann Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.