Ward v. Horace Mann Insurance

Fourth Circuit

Ward v. Horace Mann Insurance

326 F. App'x 699

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 22, 2009

DocketNo. 09-1096

StatusPublished

This text of 326 F. App'x 699 (Ward v. Horace Mann Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. Horace Mann Insurance, 326 F. App'x 699 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s summary judgment motion on their action for breach of contract under their homeowners’ insurance policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. Horace Mann Ins. Co., No. 4:07-cv-00076-F, 2008 WL [700]*7004933961 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s summary judgment motion on their action for breach of contract under their homeowners’ insurance policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ward v. Horace Mann Ins. Co., No. 4:07-cv-00076-F, 2008 WL [700]*7004933961 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

326 F. App'x 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-horace-mann-insurance-ca4-2009.