Ward v. Hill
This text of 70 Mass. 593 (Ward v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We suppose it well established as a rule of chancery that, on a hearing, an issue to try a matter of fact will be ordered or not, according to the sound judicial discretion of the court.
By the statute under which this suit is brought, an option is given to the plaintiff to proceed by bill in equity, or by action at law. Rev. Sts. c. 35, § 3. We think that when he elects to proceed by bill in equity, he has the full benefit of that remedy, with all its incidents; and that an election to proceed by bill in equity is no waiver of his right to ask for a trial by jury, where in other respects he would be entitled to it. It remained therefore for the judge, at the hearing, to decide on the motion of the plaintiff for an issue, and such interlocutory order is not open to exception.
Exceptions overruled-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 Mass. 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-hill-mass-1855.