Ward v. Hassell

66 N.C. 389
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 66 N.C. 389 (Ward v. Hassell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ward v. Hassell, 66 N.C. 389 (N.C. 1872).

Opinion

PeaRsoN, O. J.

We are unable to see any ground upon which the ruling of His Honor can be sustained.

The action is, on the bond of Hassell, as Clerk and Master-in Equity, executed in 1866.

[391]*391The breach assigned is a failure to pay the interest upon'a fund, which according to the special verdict had been in the year 1862, converted by Hassell into Confederate bonds. These ■ bonds had prior to 1866, become entirely worthless. Hassell had filed them in his office, and produced them at the trial, so that in 1866 there was no fund, and as a matter of course his securities for that year are not chargeable. Suppose some other person had been appointed^Clerk and Master [in 1866, would-he and his securities have been liable for a fund which was lost before his appointment ?] [The circumstance that Hassell was re-appointed does not alter the case at all, in respect to ■ the bond of 1866.

Error.

PeR Cubiam. Judgment reversed*..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners v. Adams
138 S.E. 5 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
State Ex Rel. Lee v. Martin
123 S.E. 631 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 N.C. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-hassell-nc-1872.