Ward v. Hamlin

142 P. 621, 71 Or. 248, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 175
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided June 30, 1914·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice McBride.

This case is identical with the case of Marx & Jorgenson v. Croisan, 17 Or. 393 (21 Pac. 310), wherein it was held that a like defect in laying the venue could not be reached by a general demurrer. The elaborate [249] opinion of Mr. Justice Lord in that case meets every contention urged by the appellant here. Were the matter res integra, a different conclusion might possibly be reached, but, as the rule there deliberately announced seems to dispose of what at best is an unprofitable technicality, we see no reason for departing from it.

The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Bean and Mr. Justice McNary concur. Mr. Justice Eakin not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. Hamlin, 142 P. 621, 71 Or. 248, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 175 (Or. 1914).

142 P. 621 (Ward v. Hamlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacK Trucks, Inc. v. Taylor
362 P.2d 364 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1961)
Wodecki v. West
108 P.2d 521 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1940)
Wheeler v. Steadman
195 P. 818 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1921)