Ward v. Garvin

195 A. 885, 328 Pa. 395, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 427
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 9, 1937·No. Appeal, 325·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, seek recovery of damages from defendant, a physician, upon a claim that he made a mistake in diagnosing an injury to the wife’s foot. The court below entered a compulsory nonsuit, which it refused to take off, relying upon our decisions, the latest of which is Duckworth v. Bennett, 320 Pa. 47, 181 A. 558, where we held that a physician is not responsible for an error of judgment or a mistake in diagnosis in the treatment of a patient. The action of the court below was correct.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. Garvin, 195 A. 885, 328 Pa. 395, 1938 Pa. LEXIS 427 (Pa. 1937).

195 A. 885 (Ward v. Garvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Passarello v. Grumbine
87 A.3d 285 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
Pringle v. Rapaport
980 A.2d 159 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Havasy v. Resnick
609 A.2d 1326 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Denardo v. Carneval
444 A.2d 135 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Altoona Clay Products, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
286 F. Supp. 899 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1968)
Smith v. Yohe
194 A.2d 167 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1963)
Graham v. Alcoa S. S. Co., Inc
201 F.2d 423 (Third Circuit, 1953)
Bierstein v. Whitman
62 A.2d 843 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
McHugh v. Audet
72 F. Supp. 394 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1947)
Hodgson v. Bigelow
7 A.2d 338 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)