Ward v. Everett

31 Ky. 429, 1 Dana 429, 1833 Ky. LEXIS 111
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 21, 1833
StatusPublished

This text of 31 Ky. 429 (Ward v. Everett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ward v. Everett, 31 Ky. 429, 1 Dana 429, 1833 Ky. LEXIS 111 (Ky. Ct. App. 1833).

Opinion

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

It seems to this court, that the circuit court erred in not perpetuating the injunction to the entire judgment.

As the judgment was for damages, interest did not accrue on it. And the payments since made, extinguished the principal sum adjudged for damages and costs.

There having been such extinguishment at Zaw, the chancellor should not withhold a decree enjoining any further collection by execution, merely because he may think that, in foro conscientúe-, the complainant ought to have paid interest. The judgment was satisfied, and cannot for any part be enforced.

Nor should the chancellor have allowed one half per cent, on the bills of exchange. There is no proof to justify the allowance, and this court cannot know that, without any proof, the lex mercatoria gives one half per cent.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions to perpetuate the injunction to the whole judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ky. 429, 1 Dana 429, 1833 Ky. LEXIS 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-everett-kyctapp-1833.