Ward v. Edesheimer
17 N.Y.S. 173, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 138, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 248
This text of 17 N.Y.S. 173 (Ward v. Edesheimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ward v. Edesheimer, 17 N.Y.S. 173, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 138, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 248 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
Opinion
The questions involved in this action were purely questions of law. There was no substantial conflict in the evidence. We think that the court below has very clearly and succintly stated the law applicable to the facts in this case, and that the judgment should be affirmed on his opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sullivan v. Schmitt
93 A.D. 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 N.Y.S. 173, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 138, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-edesheimer-nyctcompl-1892.