Ward v. Edesheimer
17 N.Y.S. 173, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 138, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 248
Opinion
The questions involved in this action were purely questions of law. There was no substantial conflict in the evidence. We think that the court below has very clearly and succintly stated the law applicable to the facts in this case, and that the judgment should be affirmed on his opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. Edesheimer, 17 N.Y.S. 173, 43 N.Y. St. Rep. 138, 1892 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 248 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
17 N.Y.S. 173 (Ward v. Edesheimer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sullivan v. Schmitt
93 A.D. 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)