Ward v. Copenhaver
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION STEPHEN WARD PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 3:22-CV-00250-LPR HAROLD COPENHAVER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER It is Plaintiffs responsibility to provide valid service information for Defendant Kaur.! The Court will give Plaintiff thirty (30) days to do so. If Plaintiff does not provide a valid service address for Defendant Kaur, and Defendant Kaur is not otherwise served in the time allowed, the Court will dismiss Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Kaur without prejudice.’ IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of March 2024.
LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
' See Lee v. Armontrout, 991 F.2d 487, 489 (8th Cir. 1993). > See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. Copenhaver (Ward v. Copenhaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.