Ward v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

687 N.W.2d 296, 471 Mich. 889
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 1, 2004
Docket124533
StatusPublished

This text of 687 N.W.2d 296 (Ward v. Consolidated Rail Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ward v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 687 N.W.2d 296, 471 Mich. 889 (Mich. 2004).

Opinion

687 N.W.2d 296 (2004)

Ward
v.
Consolidated Rail Corp.

No. 124533.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 1, 2004.

SC: 124533, COA: 234619.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2003 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall address whether the trial court correctly determined that plaintiff was entitled to a presumption that the missing evidence was defective, whether the jury was properly instructed, and whether any error was harmless. Supplemental briefs may be filed within 28 days of the date of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
687 N.W.2d 296, 471 Mich. 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-consolidated-rail-corp-mich-2004.