Ward v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

687 N.W.2d 296, 471 Mich. 889
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ward v. Consolidated Rail Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 472 Mich. 77
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 1, 2004·No. 124533·Published

Opinion

687 N.W.2d 296 (2004)

Ward
v.
Consolidated Rail Corp.

No. 124533.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 1, 2004.

SC: 124533, COA: 234619.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2003 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall address whether the trial court correctly determined that plaintiff was entitled to a presumption that the missing evidence was defective, whether the jury was properly instructed, and whether any error was harmless. Supplemental briefs may be filed within 28 days of the date of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 687 N.W.2d 296, 471 Mich. 889 (Mich. 2004).

687 N.W.2d 296 (Ward v. Consolidated Rail Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.