Ward v. Chapman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ward v. Chapman

156 S.E. 283, 42 Ga. App. 283, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 348

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 11, 1930

Docket20813

StatusPublished

This text of 156 S.E. 283 (Ward v. Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. Chapman, 156 S.E. 283, 42 Ga. App. 283, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 348 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under the facts of the case as disclosed by the record the court did not err in sustaining the motion to dismiss the affidavit of illegality. The case of Roney v. McCall, 128 Ga. 249, cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, is distinguished by its particular facts from this case.

Judgment affirmed.

LuJce and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur. McDaniel, Neely & Marshall, for plaintiff in error. V. II. Gaddis, II. G. Holbrook, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

Under the facts of the case as disclosed by the record the court did not err in sustaining the motion to dismiss the affidavit of illegality. The case of Roney v. McCall, 128 Ga. 249, cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, is distinguished by its particular facts from this case.

Judgment affirmed.

LuJce and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur. McDaniel, Neely & Marshall, for plaintiff in error. V. II. Gaddis, II. G. Holbrook, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 S.E. 283, 42 Ga. App. 283, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-chapman-gactapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack