Ward v. Berry
This text of 554 S.E.2d 532 (Ward v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Keith Berry instituted dispossessory proceedings against Jerry and Sharon Ward. After a bench trial the court granted Berry a writ of possession and judgment in the amount of $600. The Wards appeal, arguing that the court “failed to consider whether [they] had any duties to Keith Berry.” The appellate record, however, does not include a transcript of the trial.
Where an appeal is taken which draws in question the transcript of the evidence and proceedings, it shall be the duty of the appellant to have the transcript prepared at his expense. Thus, where the transcript is necessary for the review and appellant omits it from the record on appeal, the appellate court must assume the judgment below was correct and affirm.1
As the Wards’ enumeration requires consideration of evidence presented at trial, in the absence of a transcript, we must assume the court’s judgment was correct and affirm.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
554 S.E.2d 532, 251 Ga. App. 394, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 2729, 2001 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-berry-gactapp-2001.