Ward v. Berry

554 S.E.2d 532, 251 Ga. App. 394, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 2729, 2001 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 27, 2001·No. A01A1416·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Miller, Judge.

Keith Berry instituted dispossessory proceedings against Jerry and Sharon Ward. After a bench trial the court granted Berry a writ of possession and judgment in the amount of $600. The Wards appeal, arguing that the court “failed to consider whether [they] had any duties to Keith Berry.” The appellate record, however, does not include a transcript of the trial.

Where an appeal is taken which draws in question the transcript of the evidence and proceedings, it shall be the duty of the appellant to have the transcript prepared at his expense. Thus, where the transcript is necessary for the review and appellant omits it from the record on appeal, the appellate court must assume the judgment below was correct and affirm.1

As the Wards’ enumeration requires consideration of evidence presented at trial, in the absence of a transcript, we must assume the court’s judgment was correct and affirm.

Judgment affirmed.

Andrews, P. J., and Eldridge, J., concur. Sharon Ward, pro se. Keith Berry, pro se.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. Berry, 554 S.E.2d 532, 251 Ga. App. 394, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 2729, 2001 Ga. App. LEXIS 1023 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001).

554 S.E.2d 532 (Ward v. Berry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Pryer
572 S.E.2d 99 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Thompson v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
571 S.E.2d 523 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)