Ward v. Beltz
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Earl Lionell Ward, Case No. 21-CV-1515 (KMM/TNL) Petitioner,
v. ORDER
Tracy Beltz, Respondent.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung, dated September 8, 2022. No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time period permitted. The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F. Supp. 3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, the Magistrate Judge committed no error, clear or otherwise. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice as duplicative. Let Judgment Be Entered Accordingly. Date: October 31, 2022 s/ Katherine M. Menendez Katherine M. Menendez United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. Beltz (Ward v. Beltz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.