Ward v. Beeler
This text of Ward v. Beeler (Ward v. Beeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7102
GEORGE ALLEN WARD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ARTHUR F. BEELER, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Butner, North Carolina,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-606-2)
Submitted: October 8, 2002 Decided: October 22, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Allen Ward, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
George Allen Ward appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Ward v. Beeler, No. CA-01-606-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 20,
2002; entered June 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ward v. Beeler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-beeler-ca4-2002.