Ward v. Armstrong

Eighth Circuit

Ward v. Armstrong

9 F. App'x 564

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 26, 2001

DocketNo. 00-2079

StatusPublished

This text of 9 F. App'x 564 (Ward v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. Armstrong, 9 F. App'x 564 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Johnny B. Ward appeals following entry of judgment in Ward’s favor in a negligence action he brought against Rena E. Armstrong. Having. carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court did not commit error when it refused to grant Ward damages for lost wages. We have considered and reject Ward’s remaining arguments. We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Johnny B. Ward appeals following entry of judgment in Ward’s favor in a negligence action he brought against Rena E. Armstrong. Having. carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court did not commit error when it refused to grant Ward damages for lost wages. We have considered and reject Ward’s remaining arguments. We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 F. App'x 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-armstrong-ca8-2001.