Ward v. Angelone

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ward v. Angelone. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 F. App'x 690
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 14, 2002·No. 01-7516·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7516

JOHN NORFLEET WARD, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-00-353-2)

Submitted: February 27, 2002 Decided: May 14, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Norfleet Ward, III, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John Norfleet Ward, III, appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Ward v. Angelone, No. CA-00-

353-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2001). Furthermore, while we grant Ward’s

motion “to include newly discovered evidence for review with

appeal,” our review of those materials does not alter our

conclusion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. Angelone, (4th Cir. 2002).

Ward v. Angelone (Ward v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related