Warch v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

570 F. App'x 314
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 2, 2014·No. 13-2443·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brian Warch and Samuel Thames appeal the magistrate judge’s order * dismissing in part and denying relief in part on their civil action for breach of duty of fair representation against Defendant International Longshoremen’s Association, Local 333, and challenging employment practices of Defendants Steamship Trade Association, MTC, and Ports America and the magistrate judge’s order denying their Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Warch v. Int’l Longshoremen’s Ass’n, Local 333, No. 1:12-cv-00044-SKG (D.Md. Mar. 27 & Oct. 29, 2013). We deny the motion to intervene and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The parties in this case consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warch v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, 570 F. App'x 314 (4th Cir. 2014).

570 F. App'x 314 (Warch v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related