Warburton v. Polito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Warburton v. Polito

242 A.D.2d 979, 668 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10662

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion to vacate decision and for other relief denied. Memorandum: Petitioner has no cognizable basis for a CPLR article 78 proceeding because the relief that he seeks may be sought only on direct appeal. Petitioner may appeal from the order denying his motion to dismiss in the underlying action once an order has been entered and served. With respect to recusal of the Trial Judge in the underlying action, petitioner’s remedy is to move for recusal and to appeal an adverse order, if any. Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Hayes and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to vacate decision and for other relief denied. Memorandum: Petitioner has no cognizable basis for a CPLR article 78 proceeding because the relief that he seeks may be sought only on direct appeal. Petitioner may appeal from the order denying his motion to dismiss in the underlying action once an order has been entered and served. With respect to recusal of the Trial Judge in the underlying action, petitioner’s remedy is to move for recusal and to appeal an adverse order, if any. Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Hayes and Balio, JJ.

Warburton v. Polito, 242 A.D.2d 979, 668 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

242 A.D.2d 979 (Warburton v. Polito) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related