Warburton v. Polito

242 A.D.2d 979, 668 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10662
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 242 A.D.2d 979 (Warburton v. Polito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warburton v. Polito, 242 A.D.2d 979, 668 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Motion to vacate decision and for other relief denied. Memorandum: Petitioner has no cognizable basis for a CPLR article 78 proceeding because the relief that he seeks may be sought only on direct appeal. Petitioner may appeal from the order denying his motion to dismiss in the underlying action once an order has been entered and served. With respect to recusal of the Trial Judge in the underlying action, petitioner’s remedy is to move for recusal and to appeal an adverse order, if any. Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Hayes and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MatterofConcordAssociates,L.P.vLaBuda
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D.2d 979, 668 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warburton-v-polito-nyappdiv-1997.