Warburton v. N. B. Thayer Co.
72 A. 825, 75 N.H. 592, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 84
Opinion
The defendants manufactured shoes at East Rochester. The plaintiff was employed by them as a stitcher and was injured in consequence of her dress being caught upon a shaft revolving under the bench at which she worked. One ground of negligence was the absence of a skirt-guard or board. Subject to exception, the plaintiff was permitted to offer evidence that skirt-boards were generally provided in the factory. The order was,
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Warburton v. N. B. Thayer Co., 72 A. 825, 75 N.H. 592, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 84 (N.H. 1909).
72 A. 825 (Warburton v. N. B. Thayer Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bridges v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.
156 A. 697 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1931)
Rockwell v. Hustis
104 A. 127 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1918)