Warburton v. N. B. Thayer Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Warburton v. N. B. Thayer Co.

72 A. 825, 75 N.H. 592, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 84

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedApril 6, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 72 A. 825 (Warburton v. N. B. Thayer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warburton v. N. B. Thayer Co., 72 A. 825, 75 N.H. 592, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 84 (N.H. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendants manufactured shoes at East Rochester. The plaintiff was employed by them as a stitcher and was injured in consequence of her dress being caught upon a shaft revolving under the bench at which she worked. One ground of negligence was the absence of a skirt-guard or board. Subject to exception, the plaintiff was permitted to offer evidence that skirt-boards were generally provided in the factory. The order was,

Exception overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendants manufactured shoes at East Rochester. The plaintiff was employed by them as a stitcher and was injured in consequence of her dress being caught upon a shaft revolving under the bench at which she worked. One ground of negligence was the absence of a skirt-guard or board. Subject to exception, the plaintiff was permitted to offer evidence that skirt-boards were generally provided in the factory. The order was,

Exception overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A. 825, 75 N.H. 592, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warburton-v-n-b-thayer-co-nh-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack