Wappingers Central School District v. Town of Wappinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wappingers Central School District v. Town of Wappinger

54 A.D.2d 718, 387 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14319

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 718 (Wappingers Central School District v. Town of Wappinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wappingers Central School District v. Town of Wappinger, 54 A.D.2d 718, 387 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In two proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 (1) the first inter alia to review an assessment made to finance certain sewer improvements and (2) the second inter alia to review an assessment made to finance certain water district improvements, the appeals are from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (one in each proceeding), both entered March 25, 1975, which, inter alia, granted the petitions and annulled the respective assessments. Judgments affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the facts herein and the applicable law, Special Term was warranted in reaching the conclusions that it did. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78 (1) the first inter alia to review an assessment made to finance certain sewer improvements and (2) the second inter alia to review an assessment made to finance certain water district improvements, the appeals are from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (one in each proceeding), both entered March 25, 1975, which, inter alia, granted the petitions and annulled the respective assessments. Judgments affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the facts herein and the applicable law, Special Term was warranted in reaching the conclusions that it did. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 718, 387 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wappingers-central-school-district-v-town-of-wappinger-nyappdiv-1976.