Waples v. Hastings

3 Del. 403
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 1, 1842
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Del. 403 (Waples v. Hastings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waples v. Hastings, 3 Del. 403 (Del. Ct. App. 1842).

Opinion

By the Court.

The bond and warrant of attorney of an infant an void. (3 Com. Dig., Enfant B.; Co. Litt. 172, a.)

The court, on motion, will set aside a judgment on a warrant o: attorney executed by an infant. (3 Com. Dig., Enfant B.; 2 Wm. Blac. 1133; 1 H. Blac. 75, Saunderson vs. Marr.)

Even if the contract could be confirmed after full age, it would not set up the warrant of attorney. (9 Eng. Com. Law Rep. 256 Thornton vs. Illingworth.)

The bond and warrant of attorney failing, the judgment is wit out authority and must be vacated.

The cases of suits against femes covert as femes sole, have onl; decided that the court will not permit the defendant to set up he coverture in a summary way, but put her to plead the coverture.

Rule absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Del. 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waples-v-hastings-delsuperct-1842.