Wanza v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Wanza v. State

1911 OK CR 496, 118 P. 1117, 6 Okla. Crim. 677, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 518

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 22, 1911

DocketNo. A-1259.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 496 (Wanza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wanza v. State, 1911 OK CR 496, 118 P. 1117, 6 Okla. Crim. 677, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 518 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PEB CUBIAM.

Todd Wanza, plaintiff in error, was tried and convicted in the district court of Okfuskee county upon an indictment duly returned by the grand jury where he was charged with the crime of selling intoxicating liquor to a minor. February 15, 1911, he was sentenced to serve a term of three years imprisonment at hard labor in the penitentiary. To reverse this judgment an appeal was perfected. The Attorney General confesses error for the reason that in the case of John Nowakowski v. State, infra, 116 Pac. 351, it was by this, court held that the act under which this prosecution was instituted and carried on is unconstitutional and void. The confession of error is sustained. The judgment of the district court of Okfuskee county is reversed and the cause remanded with direction to transfer the same to the county court of said county for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEB CUBIAM.

Todd Wanza, plaintiff in error, was tried and convicted in the district court of Okfuskee county upon an indictment duly returned by the grand jury where he was charged with the crime of selling intoxicating liquor to a minor. February 15, 1911, he was sentenced to serve a term of three years imprisonment at hard labor in the penitentiary. To reverse this judgment an appeal was perfected. The Attorney General confesses error for the reason that in the case of John Nowakowski v. State, infra, 116 Pac. 351, it was by this, court held that the act under which this prosecution was instituted and carried on is unconstitutional and void. The confession of error is sustained. The judgment of the district court of Okfuskee county is reversed and the cause remanded with direction to transfer the same to the county court of said county for trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 496, 118 P. 1117, 6 Okla. Crim. 677, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wanza-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack