Wantanabe Realty Co. v. H.B. Singer, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wantanabe Realty Co. v. H.B. Singer, Inc.

170 A.D.2d 670, 567 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3175

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 25, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated November 30, 1988, which granted the plaintiffs motion for a change of venue.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the motion to change venue in order to avoid any appearance of impropriety (see, Milazzo v Long Is. Light. Co., 106 AD2d 495, 496; see also, DeLuca v CBS, Inc., 105 AD2d 770). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Fiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated November 30, 1988, which granted the plaintiffs motion for a change of venue.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the motion to change venue in order to avoid any appearance of impropriety (see, Milazzo v Long Is. Light. Co., 106 AD2d 495, 496; see also, DeLuca v CBS, Inc., 105 AD2d 770). Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Fiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Wantanabe Realty Co. v. H.B. Singer, Inc., 170 A.D.2d 670, 567 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3175 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

170 A.D.2d 670 (Wantanabe Realty Co. v. H.B. Singer, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related