Wanser v. Hubbard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wanser v. Hubbard

252 A.D. 787, 299 N.Y.S. 123, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6294

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 787 (Wanser v. Hubbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wanser v. Hubbard, 252 A.D. 787, 299 N.Y.S. 123, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6294 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of being thrown from an automobile truck owned and operated by defendant, plaintiff had a verdict for $3,000 in the County Court of Nassau county. Judgment reversed on the facts, on the ground that the verdict for damages is against the weight of evidence and is excessive, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless within ten days from the entry of the order hereon plaintiff stipulate to a reduction of the verdict to $1,500; in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of being thrown from an automobile truck owned and operated by defendant, plaintiff had a verdict for $3,000 in the County Court of Nassau county. Judgment reversed on the facts, on the ground that the verdict for damages is against the weight of evidence and is excessive, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, unless within ten days from the entry of the order hereon plaintiff stipulate to a reduction of the verdict to $1,500; in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 787, 299 N.Y.S. 123, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wanser-v-hubbard-nyappdiv-1937.