Wanner v. Emanuel's Church of Evangelical Ass'n

34 A. 188, 174 Pa. 466, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 907
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 7, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 307·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff’s statement did allege that the money for which the notes in suit were given was lent to the defendant corporation, and that the persons signing were trustees of the defendant and were duly authorized to execute and deliver the notes in question. These averments are not denied in the affidavit of defense. The matters which are there averred we do not regard as a defense to these notes. We are satisfied with the reasoning and authorities expressed and cited in the opinion of the learned court below, and that the conclusion reached was correct.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wanner v. Emanuel's Church of Evangelical Ass'n, 34 A. 188, 174 Pa. 466, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 907 (Pa. 1896).

34 A. 188 (Wanner v. Emanuel's Church of Evangelical Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chips Distributing Corp. v. Smith
48 Misc. 2d 1079 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)
In re Laskin
204 F. Supp. 106 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1962)
Schoenfeld v. Meckes
57 Pa. D. & C. 531 (Philadelphia County Municipal Court, 1946)
Schuling v. Ervin
185 Iowa 1 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1918)
Paist v. Spittall
56 Pa. Super. 408 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Hill Estate Co. v. Whittlesey
57 P. 345 (Washington Supreme Court, 1899)
DeRoy v. Richards
8 Pa. Super. 119 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)