Wannall v. Gadsden Cnty. Emergency Med. Servs.

265 So. 3d 738
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 20, 2019
DocketNo. 1D18-1654
StatusPublished

This text of 265 So. 3d 738 (Wannall v. Gadsden Cnty. Emergency Med. Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wannall v. Gadsden Cnty. Emergency Med. Servs., 265 So. 3d 738 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellants seek review of an order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees. We find any foreseeable zone of risk did not extend to Appellants. Accordingly, Appellees did not owe a duty of care to Appellants, and we affirm the trial court's order. See Parker v. Murphy , 510 So.2d 990 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (affirming summary judgment in favor of the sheriff after a prisoner twice escaped and attacked appellant and her husband holding there was no special relationship between the sheriff and appellant, and thus, no duty of care).

AFFIRMED .

Makar, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. Murphy
510 So. 2d 990 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 So. 3d 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wannall-v-gadsden-cnty-emergency-med-servs-fladistctapp-2019.