Wanguhu v. Gonzales

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1877

HANNIBAL NGANGA WANGUHU,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-513-031)

Submitted: May 17, 2006 Decided: June 6, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Hannibal Nganga Wanguhu, a native and citizen of Kenya,

seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(Board) denying his motion to reopen and reconsider removal

proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and

conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying

Wanguhu’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2006).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the

reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Wanguhu, No. A79-513-031

(B.I.A. Jul. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -