Wanger v. Hipple

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wanger v. Hipple

13 A. 81, 10 Sadler 25, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 1048

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 19, 1888·No. No. 393·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam:

It is hard to understand why the defendant should complain of the rulings of the court below. They are as favorable to him as he had any right to expect, and in some of them complaint might well come from the other side. Hippie’s right of way was established beyond controversy, and the attempt to break [32] down that right by proof of user under a license was a total failure; and so the court might have instructed the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam:

It is hard to understand why the defendant should complain of the rulings of the court below. They are as favorable to him as he had any right to expect, and in some of them complaint might well come from the other side. Hippie’s right of way was established beyond controversy, and the attempt to break [32] down that right by proof of user under a license was a total failure; and so the court might have instructed the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Wanger v. Hipple, 13 A. 81, 10 Sadler 25, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 1048 (Pa. 1888).

Pincite

13 A. 81 (Wanger v. Hipple) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related