Wanger v. Hipple

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wanger v. Hipple

13 A. 81, 10 Sadler 25, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 1048

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 19, 1888

DocketNo. 393

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 A. 81 (Wanger v. Hipple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wanger v. Hipple, 13 A. 81, 10 Sadler 25, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 1048 (Pa. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam:

It is hard to understand why the defendant should complain of the rulings of the court below. They are as favorable to him as he had any right to expect, and in some of them complaint might well come from the other side. Hippie’s right of way was established beyond controversy, and the attempt to break [32]*32down that right by proof of user under a license was a total failure; and so the court might have instructed the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam:

It is hard to understand why the defendant should complain of the rulings of the court below. They are as favorable to him as he had any right to expect, and in some of them complaint might well come from the other side. Hippie’s right of way was established beyond controversy, and the attempt to break [32]*32down that right by proof of user under a license was a total failure; and so the court might have instructed the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A. 81, 10 Sadler 25, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 1048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wanger-v-hipple-pa-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack