Wangenheim v. New York Stock Yards Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wangenheim v. New York Stock Yards Co.

171 A.D. 897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D. 897 (Wangenheim v. New York Stock Yards Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wangenheim v. New York Stock Yards Co., 171 A.D. 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We think that the negligence alleged in the complaint was not the proximate cause of the injury complained of, and that, therefore, the action of the trial court in dismissing the complaint was correct. It follows that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. Present—.Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissented. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We think that the negligence alleged in the complaint was not the proximate cause of the injury complained of, and that, therefore, the action of the trial court in dismissing the complaint was correct. It follows that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. Present—.Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissented. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.D. 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wangenheim-v-new-york-stock-yards-co-nyappdiv-1915.