Wang v. Verizon Communications Inc.

S.D. New York

Wang v. Verizon Communications Inc.

DecidedAugust 12, 2020

Docket1:19-cv-09506

StatusUnknown

This text of Wang v. Verizon Communications Inc. (Wang v. Verizon Communications Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wang v. Verizon Communications Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED:__ 8/12/2020 nnn nen eK HAO ZHE WANG, : 19-cv-9506 (JMF) (RWL) Plaintiff, : ORDER - against - : VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al. Defendants. nnn nen eK ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's motion to compel this Court to order Defendants to reimburse the $366.84 spent on serving those Defendants who rejected his requests for waiver is denied without prejudice in light of Plaintiff's failure to demonstrate strict compliance with the requirements of Rule 4(d)(2). See Jackson v. New York State, et al., No. 03-CV-0577, 2005 WL 8171090, at *2 (N.D.N.Y. May 5, 2005). If Plaintiff wishes to renew his request, by September 11, 2020, Plaintiff shall file proof that he submitted notice and waiver that complied with all requirements of Rule 4(d)(2). /d. The Clerk is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at Dkt. 77. SO ORDERED.

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: August 12, 2020 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED:__ 8/12/2020 nnn nen eK HAO ZHE WANG, : 19-cv-9506 (JMF) (RWL) Plaintiff, : ORDER - against - : VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al. Defendants. nnn nen eK ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's motion to compel this Court to order Defendants to reimburse the $366.84 spent on serving those Defendants who rejected his requests for waiver is denied without prejudice in light of Plaintiff's failure to demonstrate strict compliance with the requirements of Rule 4(d)(2). See Jackson v. New York State, et al., No. 03-CV-0577, 2005 WL 8171090, at *2 (N.D.N.Y. May 5, 2005). If Plaintiff wishes to renew his request, by September 11, 2020, Plaintiff shall file proof that he submitted notice and waiver that complied with all requirements of Rule 4(d)(2). /d. The Clerk is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at Dkt. 77. SO ORDERED.

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: August 12, 2020 New York, New York

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Wang v. Verizon Communications Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wang-v-verizon-communications-inc-nysd-2020.