Wang v. First Nat. Bank of Florala

110 So. 527, 92 Fla. 974
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 24, 1926·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this case the Appellee brought suit to foreclose a mortgage on personal property, including crops. *975 There was a demurrer filed to the bill of complaint. The bill of complaint contained allegations of equity and therefor the demurrer was properly overruled.

The decree is attacked upon the ground that it was not supported by the evidence.

The rulings of the Chancellor who tried the cause are presumed upon appeal to be correct and the burden is upon the Appellant to make it clearly to appear that such rulings are erroneous or the decree will be affirmed. (Jackson v. Jackson, 80 Fla. 557; 86 Sou. 510, and cases there cited.)

The decree is affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wang v. First Nat. Bank of Florala, 110 So. 527, 92 Fla. 974 (Fla. 1926).

110 So. 527 (Wang v. First Nat. Bank of Florala) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

G. & L. Roofing Co. v. Thoma
196 So. 414 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
In Re: Estate of Donne'ly v. Ashby
188 So. 108 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Snedigar v. Keefer
179 So. 421 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Thomas v. Thompson
155 So. 321 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Gardiner v. Goertner
149 So. 186 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Hatch v. Trabue
128 So. 420 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)