Wanek v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co.
This text of 250 A.D. 883 (Wanek v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for damages for breach of warranty of fitness [884]*884of food for human consumption, judgment for plaintiff affirmed, with costs, pursuant to the provisions of section 106 of the Civil Practice Act; order denying motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur; Taylor, J., dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D. 883, 297 N.Y.S. 438, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wanek-v-great-atlantic-and-pacific-tea-co-nyappdiv-1937.