Wands v. Central Warehouse Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wands v. Central Warehouse Corp.

45 A.D.2d 894, 358 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4514

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 1974·Published

Opinion

Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. No opinion. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblett, Sweeney and Main, JJ., concur; Reynolds, J., dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum. Reynolds, J. (dissenting). There is no tension shown in this case which would be sufficient to constitute an accident either as a matter of law under the eases or as a matter of substantial evidence. The record does not contain substantial medical evidence that the alleged tension was a contributing factor in the myocardial infarction and the decision should be reversed and the claim dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. No opinion. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblett, Sweeney and Main, JJ., concur; Reynolds, J., dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum. Reynolds, J. (dissenting). There is no tension shown in this case which would be sufficient to constitute an accident either as a matter of law under the eases or as a matter of substantial evidence. The record does not contain substantial medical evidence that the alleged tension was a contributing factor in the myocardial infarction and the decision should be reversed and the claim dismissed.

Wands v. Central Warehouse Corp., 45 A.D.2d 894, 358 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4514 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

45 A.D.2d 894 (Wands v. Central Warehouse Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.