Wander Vs. Berstein & Poisson
This text of Wander Vs. Berstein & Poisson (Wander Vs. Berstein & Poisson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
PERRY C. WANDER, INDIVIDUALLY, No. 81747 Appellant, vs. BERNSTEIN & POISSON, F171 Respondent. SEP 2 8 2O2O ELZ!.rfl: CLERK 0";-.0 COURT BY E7k71-7 i.ERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This appeal was docketed on September 8, 2020, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 10 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2). It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
By: Cr
cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Perry C. Wander Bernstein & Poisson Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERIC'S ORDER
(o).()47
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wander Vs. Berstein & Poisson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wander-vs-berstein-poisson-nev-2020.