Wander Vs. Berstein & Poisson
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
PERRY C. WANDER, INDIVIDUALLY, No. 81747 Appellant, vs. BERNSTEIN & POISSON,
F171
Respondent. SEP 2 8 2O2O ELZ!.rfl: CLERK 0";-.0 COURT BY
E7k71-7 i.ERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This appeal was docketed on September 8, 2020, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 10 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2).
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
By: Cr
cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Perry C. Wander Bernstein & Poisson Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERIC'S ORDER
(o).()47
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wander Vs. Berstein & Poisson (Wander Vs. Berstein & Poisson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.