Wanda Williams v. University Community Academy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wanda Williams v. University Community Academy

DecidedOctober 29, 2013

DocketA13A1345

StatusPublished

This text of Wanda Williams v. University Community Academy (Wanda Williams v. University Community Academy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wanda Williams v. University Community Academy, (Ga. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________ October 29, 2013

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A13A1345. WILLIAMS v. UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY ACADEMY.

Wanda Williams sued University Community Academy (“the Academy”) for breach of an alleged employment contract after the Academy declined to hire her to teach in the fall of 2011, following the Atlanta Public Schools cheating scandal. The Academy answered the complaint and, after discovery, moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion on the grounds that (1) no contract was formed; (2) even if a contract was formed, it was for employment “at will,” and the Academy could terminate Williams with or without cause; and (3) even if Williams was not an “at will” employee, the Academy had sufficient cause to terminate her.

Williams filed this appeal arguing only that genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether a valid employment contract was formed. Williams’s appeal does not challenge the trial court’s alternative bases for granting summary judgment, and as such the appeal is moot. “This Court will dismiss an appeal as moot where it affirmatively appears that a decision would be of no benefit to the complaining party.” Ray v. Hartwell R.R. Co., 289 Ga. 452, 453 (711 SE2d 722) (2011). Even if the Court were to determine that a valid contract existed, Williams would not be entitled to reversal in light of the trial court’s unchallenged rulings that Williams’s claim fails as a matter of law on alternative grounds. Accordingly, Williams cannot benefit from resolution of the issue she raised on appeal, and the appeal is DISMISSED as moot. See id. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 10/29/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________ October 29, 2013

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A13A1345. WILLIAMS v. UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY ACADEMY.

Wanda Williams sued University Community Academy (“the Academy”) for breach of an alleged employment contract after the Academy declined to hire her to teach in the fall of 2011, following the Atlanta Public Schools cheating scandal. The Academy answered the complaint and, after discovery, moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion on the grounds that (1) no contract was formed; (2) even if a contract was formed, it was for employment “at will,” and the Academy could terminate Williams with or without cause; and (3) even if Williams was not an “at will” employee, the Academy had sufficient cause to terminate her.

Williams filed this appeal arguing only that genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether a valid employment contract was formed. Williams’s appeal does not challenge the trial court’s alternative bases for granting summary judgment, and as such the appeal is moot. “This Court will dismiss an appeal as moot where it affirmatively appears that a decision would be of no benefit to the complaining party.” Ray v. Hartwell R.R. Co., 289 Ga. 452, 453 (711 SE2d 722) (2011). Even if the Court were to determine that a valid contract existed, Williams would not be entitled to reversal in light of the trial court’s unchallenged rulings that Williams’s claim fails as a matter of law on alternative grounds. Accordingly, Williams cannot benefit from resolution of the issue she raised on appeal, and the appeal is DISMISSED as moot. See id. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 10/29/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Wanda Williams v. University Community Academy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wanda-williams-v-university-community-academy-gactapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack