Wanda Thompson v. Conagra Brands, Inc.

Eighth Circuit

Wanda Thompson v. Conagra Brands, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 10, 2025

Docket25-1309

StatusUnpublished

This text of Wanda Thompson v. Conagra Brands, Inc. (Wanda Thompson v. Conagra Brands, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wanda Thompson v. Conagra Brands, Inc., (8th Cir. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 25-1309 ___________________________

Wanda Thompson

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Conagra Brands, Inc., originally named as Conagra Brands

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________

Submitted: September 3, 2025 Filed: September 10, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________

Before SMITH, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas resident Wanda Thompson appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, Conagra

1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Brands, Inc., on her claims of race discrimination and retaliation. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude the adverse grant of summary judgment was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. See Williams v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 963 F.3d 803, 807 (8th Cir. 2020) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI