Wanda Thompson v. Conagra Brands, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 10, 2025·No. 25-1309·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 25-1309

Wanda Thompson

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Conagra Brands, Inc., originally named as Conagra Brands

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central

Submitted: September 3, 2025 Filed: September 10, 2025 [Unpublished]

Before SMITH, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas resident Wanda Thompson appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in favor of her former employer, Conagra

1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Brands, Inc., on her claims of race discrimination and retaliation. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude the adverse grant of summary judgment was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. See Williams v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 963 F.3d 803, 807 (8th Cir. 2020) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wanda Thompson v. Conagra Brands, Inc., (8th Cir. 2025).

Wanda Thompson v. Conagra Brands, Inc. (Wanda Thompson v. Conagra Brands, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cedric Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
963 F.3d 803 (Eighth Circuit, 2020)