Wanda Hudson v. State Farm Insurance Company

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 15, 2019
• Docket: 19-1025
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1025

WANDA HUDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY; NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY; ENTERPRISE RENTAL CAR; WAKEMED HOSPITALS (OF CARY); ROCK QUARRY ROAD FAMILY MEDICINE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:17-cv-00516-FL)

Submitted: July 9, 2019 Decided: August 15, 2019

Before KEENAN, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wanda S. Hudson, Appellant Pro Se. James Scott Lewis, BUTLER SNOW LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina; Gemma Lillian Saluta, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Samuel Batiste Hartzell, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth Sims Hedrick, FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wanda S. Hudson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her civil

complaint, dismissing Hudson’s federal claims and remanding her state law claims to the

state court. ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Hudson v. State Farm Ins. Co., No. 5:17-cv-00516-FL (E.D.N.C. July

9, 2018 & Jan. 3, 2019). We deny Hudson’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ The district court’s order remanding Hudson’s state law claims to the state court is a final decision appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012). See Bryan v. BellSouth Commc’ns, Inc., 377 F.3d 424, 428 (4th Cir. 2004)