Wanamaker v. Springstead

274 A.D. 1008, 85 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4480
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 27, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 274 A.D. 1008 (Wanamaker v. Springstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wanamaker v. Springstead, 274 A.D. 1008, 85 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages by reason of the death of plaintiff’s intestate, caused as a result of a collision between two automobiles, operated, respectively, by the two defendants, judg[1009]*1009ment was had in favor of plaintiff against defendant Springstead, and in favor of defendant Christopher against plaintiff, upon a jury verdict. Defendant Christopher had died before the trial, which proceeded as though he were alive, without substitution of parties. Defendant Springstead has appealed from the judgment and the trial court’s denial of his motion to set aside the verdict; plaintiff has appealed from so much of the judgment as dismisses the complaint against defendant Christopher; and defendant Springstead and plaintiff have appealed from an order permitting defendant Christopher to serve an amended answer. On the appeal by defendant Springstead from the judgment, judgment reversed on the law and the facts and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Participation in the trial by an attorney, purportedly on behalf of the deceased defendant, including examination of witnesses and presentation of other evidence, subjected this appellant’s defense to the efforts of one who was not properly before the court. Furthermore, the trial court’s instructions to the jury with respect to the plaintiff’s right to recover against the defendant Christopher, in the event that the jury should find that plaintiff’s intestate and Christopher were fellow employees, were contradictory and in part erroneous. A new trial is required in the interests of substantial justice. Plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment is dismissed, without costs. Since there had been no appropriate substitution for the deceased defendant, the judgment, insofar as it affects that defendant is a nullity. (Civ. Prae. Act, § 478.) Prior to the new trial, the action should be severed as against the deceased defendant (Civ. Prae. Act, § 85), or an administrator substituted as a party defendant in his place. (Decedent Estate Law, § 118.) Defendant Springstead’s appeal from the denial of his motion to set aside the verdict is dismissed, without costs. Apparently no order upon this motion was entered and no order to such effect is contained in the record. Appeals by defendant Springstead and plaintiff from the order permitting amendment of defendant Christopher’s answer are dismissed, without costs. It was made after said defendant’s death. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1066.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldbard v. Kirchik
20 A.D.2d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Lord v. Sherman
18 A.D.2d 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
In re the Estate of Davis
31 Misc. 2d 270 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1961)
Mazzullo v. Wieland
9 A.D.2d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Speier v. St. Francis Church
3 A.D.2d 732 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
East Flatbush Development Corp. v. Donavan
3 Misc. 2d 551 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 A.D. 1008, 85 N.Y.S.2d 27, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wanamaker-v-springstead-nyappdiv-1948.