Wanagel v. Community Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wanagel v. Community Hospital

256 A.D.2d 573, 682 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14017

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 573 (Wanagel v. Community Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wanagel v. Community Hospital, 256 A.D.2d 573, 682 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14017 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the [574]*574Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.), entered December 29, 1997, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant Lawrence Schulman and against her dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Lawrence Schulman.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the jury verdict was not against the weight of the evidence but was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Copertino, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the [574]*574Supreme Court, Westchester County (Fredman, J.), entered December 29, 1997, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant Lawrence Schulman and against her dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Lawrence Schulman.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the jury verdict was not against the weight of the evidence but was based upon a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Copertino, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 573, 682 N.Y.S.2d 885, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wanagel-v-community-hospital-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack