Wampler v. Walker

Texas Supreme Court

Wampler v. Walker

28 Tex. 598

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1866

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 28 Tex. 598 (Wampler v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wampler v. Walker, 28 Tex. 598 (Tex. 1866).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, J.

—In this cause we find that the motion of Walker for a new trial was sustained, and there being no final judgment, this court has no jurisdiction of the cause, as has been often decided.

The statement of facts does not appear to have been signed by the judge, by reason of which it could not be noticed in this court.

The writ of error has not been served on the defendant Brundage, and only on the attorney of the defendant Cole, without showing that he cannot be found. This service is incomplete. Dor these defects the cause will be stricken from the docket.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.

—In this cause we find that the motion of Walker for a new trial was sustained, and there being no final judgment, this court has no jurisdiction of the cause, as has been often decided.

The statement of facts does not appear to have been signed by the judge, by reason of which it could not be noticed in this court.

The writ of error has not been served on the defendant Brundage, and only on the attorney of the defendant Cole, without showing that he cannot be found. This service is incomplete. Dor these defects the cause will be stricken from the docket.

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Tex. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wampler-v-walker-tex-1866.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack