Wampler v. Walker

28 Tex. 598
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1866·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

—In this cause we find that the motion of Walker for a new trial was sustained, and there being no final judgment, this court has no jurisdiction of the cause, as has been often decided.

The statement of facts does not appear to have been signed by the judge, by reason of which it could not be noticed in this court.

The writ of error has not been served on the defendant Brundage, and only on the attorney of the defendant Cole, without showing that he cannot be found. This service is incomplete. Dor these defects the cause will be stricken from the docket.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wampler v. Walker, 28 Tex. 598 (Tex. 1866).

28 Tex. 598 (Wampler v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henwood v. Kolb
157 S.W.2d 947 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)
Tietjen v. Snead
24 P. 324 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1890)
Taylor v. Campbell
59 Tex. 315 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)
Farley v. Deslonde
58 Tex. 588 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)
Linn v. Arambould
55 Tex. 611 (Texas Supreme Court, 1881)