Wambst v. Wambst

391 So. 2d 375
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 23, 1980·No. No. 79-2287·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of marriage dissolution under review is affirmed with one modification. The provision in the final judgment which prohibits any male adult not married to the appellant-wife from staying overnight in the parties’ former marital abode [in which appellant-wife was awarded temporary occupancy] is reversed as being overbroad and an improper attempt to regulate the private life of the appellant-wife. Dominik v. Dominik, 390 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Sheffield v. Sheffield, 310 So.2d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 328 So.2d 844 (Fla.1976). The balance of appellant’s contentions upon this appeal are rejected as having no merit. Duncan v. Duncan, 379 So.2d 949, 952 (Fla.1980); Ball v. Ball, 335 So.2d 5 (Fla.1976); Leonard v. Leonard, 389 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); see Groover v. Walker, 88 So.2d 312 (Fla.1956).

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wambst v. Wambst, 391 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

391 So. 2d 375 (Wambst v. Wambst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Condren v. Condren
475 So. 2d 268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Bolton v. Bolton
412 So. 2d 72 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Smith v. Smith
396 So. 2d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Trylko v. Trylko
392 So. 2d 1034 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)