Waltz v. Waltz

18 Ind. 449
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1862
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 18 Ind. 449 (Waltz v. Waltz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waltz v. Waltz, 18 Ind. 449 (Ind. 1862).

Opinion

Hanna, J.

The only question in this case is, whether an applicant for divorce must not only be a resident in good faith of the county at the time the application for divorce is instituted, but also at the time of the trial.

The statute is as follows: “ Divorces may be decreed by the Circuit Courts of this State, on petition filed by any person who, at the time of the filing.of such petition, shall have been a bona fide resideut of the State one year previous to the filing of the same, and a resident of the county at the time of the filing such petition.” Acts 1859, 108.

We suppose this statute does not admit of any interpretation different from its literal reading; that if the applicant was in good faith a resident, at the time named, non-residence at the time of trial would not prevent the Court from acting in the premises.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Gibson
23 S.E.2d 50 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Hill v. Hill
151 P. 268 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)
Duxstad v. Duxstad
100 P. 112 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Ind. 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waltz-v-waltz-ind-1862.