Walton v. Walton

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Walton v. Walton

469 So. 2d 658, 1985 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1189

CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama

DecidedApril 10, 1985

DocketCiv. 4547

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 469 So. 2d 658 (Walton v. Walton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walton v. Walton, 469 So. 2d 658, 1985 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1189 (Ala. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

The only issue presented in this appeal by the husband from a judgment of divorce is that the trial court abused its discretion in granting alimony to the wife without a request for it in the complaint.

We have examined the record and find that the complaint of the wife contained a general request for relief. There was also substantial testimony as to the income and expenses of both husband and wife. After hearing such testimony ore tenus, the trial judge determined that the husband could pay the nominal sum of $25 per week as alimony. Such determination was within the discretionary power of the trial judge. Colombaro v. Colombaro, 54 Ala.App. 157, 306 So.2d 23 (1975). We presume such finding to be correct. Clift v. Clift, 346 So.2d 429 (Ala.Civ.App.1977).

Upon authority of Tidwell v. Tidwell, 379 So.2d 614 (Ala.Civ.App.1980); Bouler v. Bouler, 366 So.2d 290 (Ala.Civ.App.1979); Awad v. Awad, 54 Ala.App. 154, 306 So.2d 21 (1975), and Rules 15(b) and 54(c), A.R. Civ.P., the judgment below is affirmed.

The request of appellee for an attorney’s fee on appeal is granted in the sum of $500.

AFFIRMED.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

The only issue presented in this appeal by the husband from a judgment of divorce is that the trial court abused its discretion in granting alimony to the wife without a request for it in the complaint.

We have examined the record and find that the complaint of the wife contained a general request for relief. There was also substantial testimony as to the income and expenses of both husband and wife. After hearing such testimony ore tenus, the trial judge determined that the husband could pay the nominal sum of $25 per week as alimony. Such determination was within the discretionary power of the trial judge. Colombaro v. Colombaro, 54 Ala.App. 157, 306 So.2d 23 (1975). We presume such finding to be correct. Clift v. Clift, 346 So.2d 429 (Ala.Civ.App.1977).

Upon authority of Tidwell v. Tidwell, 379 So.2d 614 (Ala.Civ.App.1980); Bouler v. Bouler, 366 So.2d 290 (Ala.Civ.App.1979); Awad v. Awad, 54 Ala.App. 154, 306 So.2d 21 (1975), and Rules 15(b) and 54(c), A.R. Civ.P., the judgment below is affirmed.

The request of appellee for an attorney’s fee on appeal is granted in the sum of $500.

AFFIRMED.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

469 So. 2d 658, 1985 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walton-v-walton-alacivapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack